Free industry report · 2026 edition

2026 Background Screening Benchmark Report

What U.S. employers report paying, choosing, and struggling with, and how to benchmark your own program.

Published by All Screeners · allscreeners.com · 2026 Edition

Headline numbers

$51
median spend per hire
54%
have not switched provider
19 pts
gap between wanting ATS integration and having it

If you read nothing else

02. The State of Background Screening

91%
run at least one background check
78%
screen every hire
2,418
CRAs tracked by All Screeners as of 2026

Why employers screen: liability protection (68%), regulatory requirement (54%), workplace safety (49%), confirming candidate qualifications (41%), and insurance/bonding requirements (19%).

03. Who Employers Use, and Why Most Never Switch

34%+
largest single provider category: regional/independent CRAs
54%
have never switched providers
11%
switched in the past 12 months

The 11% figure for switching in the past 12 months lines up closely with PBSA’s own published survey, which found 10% had switched or planned to, a useful cross-check on the modelled data.

Among employers who did switch, the top reasons were turnaround time (41%), pricing (37%), poor service (33%), needing report types their provider didn’t offer (19%), and compliance concerns (14%).

The market has consolidated quickly: First Advantage and Sterling merged in October 2024 in a $2.2B deal, GoodHire has operated as a Checkr brand since 2022, HireRight went private in June 2024, and DISA has acquired five or more businesses in recent years.

Employers who never switch providers pay a raw 21% premium versus employers who have switched at least once. After adjusting for company size, that gap narrows to a still-meaningful 9%.

04. What Employers Actually Pay

$64
average spend per hire
$51
median spend per hire
$21
average price for a single county criminal search

Three distinct numbers all get called "price": total spend per hire rises with company size, unit price per individual check falls with company size (larger buyers negotiate volume pricing), and the spread between employers is wide at every size band.

What a single report type typically costs (Table 14)
Report typeAvg. price
SSN trace$7
Motor vehicle record (MVR)$12
License verification$13
Education verification$14
Credit report$14
Federal criminal search$15
National criminal database$20
County criminal search$21
Employment verification$22
Drug screening$42
Spend by company size (Table 15)
Company sizeSpend / hireUnits / hirePrice / county search
1–9 employees$462.5$27
10–49 employees$543.1$24
50–99 employees$663.8$21
100–249 employees$764.6$18
250–499 employees$836.1$14
500+ employees$888.8$12
All employers$644.2$21

05. How Employers Choose: Integrated vs. Independent

41%
choose an integrated (ATS-bundled) provider first, overall

That number isn’t flat across company sizes, it forms an arc. Only 14% of the smallest employers (1–9 employees) go integrated-first, mostly because 74% of businesses that size use no formal applicant tracking system at all. Integrated-first buying peaks at 61% in the 100–249 employee range, where an ATS bundle is genuinely convenient, then falls back to 47% at 250–499 employees and just 29% at 500+ employees.

Large employers outgrow the bundle for specific reasons: the bundled provider didn’t offer a report type they needed (48%), turnaround was too slow at their volume (41%), cost at volume (39%), wanting a dedicated account team (34%), and coverage gaps (27%).

06. Applicant Tracking Systems & Integration

29%
use no formal ATS at all
43%
say integration is a significant factor in choosing a provider
24%
say their current provider is actually integrated

Payroll and HR suites with built-in hiring tools (ADP, Paychex, Paycor, isolved, Paylocity, Gusto, BambooHR, Rippling) account for 42% of employers combined, far more than dedicated ATS platforms (Greenhouse, Lever, Ashby, Workday, iCIMS, SuccessFactors), which account for only about 2%.

The 19-point gap between employers who say integration matters (43%) and those who say they actually have it (24%) is one of the clearest unmet-need signals in the whole dataset.

07. Where Screening Relationships Break Down

Among employers reporting a negative experience: turnaround slower than promised (44%), poor or slow customer support (36%), a confusing adverse-action/compliance process (31%), inconsistent report accuracy (27%), and pricing surprises or hidden fees (24%).

The adverse-action/compliance process almost certainly carries the highest real cost of any complaint on this list, given FCRA litigation exposure, even though it ranks third by how often employers say it bothers them. Report accuracy is the top concern of regulators, but it ranks lower here because this measures who feels the pain, not how often the underlying problem actually occurs.

Complaint rate by report type, among employers with a negative experience (Table 22)
Report typeComplaint rate
Employment verification47%
County criminal search41%
National criminal database38%
Education verification29%
Professional license verification24%
Credit report19%
Motor vehicle record (MVR)12%
Drug screening9%
Sex offender registry7%
SSN trace4%

08. PBSA Accreditation: What It Means and Why It Matters

750+
PBSA member companies globally
38%
confident their current provider is accredited
29%
could explain what PBSA accreditation actually means

PBSA (formerly NAPBS) accreditation covers six audit areas: information security, legal and compliance, client education, researcher and data standards, verification service standards, and general business practices. Accreditation is a distinct, higher bar than simple membership.

Among employers familiar with the program, 71% call it a meaningful signal, but 40% are unsure whether their own provider even holds it. Accreditation runs on a five-year cycle with a year-three surveillance audit.

09. Benchmarks by Industry

Screening benchmarks by industry (Table 31)
IndustryScreens every hireAvg. spend / hireTurnaround toleranceTop pain point
Financial Services & Insurance96%$1013–5 daysCompliance / adverse-action complexity
Healthcare & Social Assistance94%$861–2 daysTurnaround vs. credentialing deadlines
Transportation & Logistics91%$771–2 daysDOT-specific compliance complexity
Education & Nonprofit87%$593–5 daysState-specific requirements add complexity
Professional & Business Services78%$642–3 daysVerification completion rates
Manufacturing76%$481–2 daysTurnaround on high-volume seasonal hiring
Technology & Software73%$682–3 daysCoverage for remote, multi-state, international hires
Construction & Skilled Trades66%$521–2 daysCoverage gaps in rural / multi-state counties
Retail & Hospitality58%$37Same day – 1 dayCost per hire at high volume

10. Benchmarks by Company Size

Screening benchmarks by company size (Table 32)
Company sizeScreens every hireSpend / hirePrice / county searchTop vendor priority
1–9 employees52%$46$27Price / simplicity
10–49 employees71%$54$24Turnaround time
50–99 employees82%$66$21Turnaround / reliability
100–249 employees89%$76$18ATS / HRIS integration
250–499 employees94%$83$14Compliance support & account team
500+ employees97%$88$12Verification completion & volume SLAs

11. How to Choose the Right Background Screening Company

Three ways All Screeners can help

Find Your Match Free

Answer a few questions about your hiring needs and get matched with background screening providers that fit, in minutes.

A Customized Version of This Report Free

Tell us about your industry, hiring volume, states, and current provider, and get a version of these benchmarks built around your own program. It uses largely the same information as Find Your Match, so there’s no second form to fill out from scratch.

True Fit $395

The All Screeners team reviews your current screening setup and hiring profile, benchmarks it against comparable employers, and matches you with a better-fit vendor. 100% Satisfaction Guarantee: you’ll save more than our fee and prefer your new provider, or you get every dollar back.

Browse the provider directory